THE COURT: Especially one that wanted to be returned to office.

MR. ENSTROM: My point is, where the Court assumes a legislative role, along with that goes greater latitude as to what evidence you want to receive.

THE COURT: You know, Mr. Enstrom, judges are never consistent. You know that. I sustain the objection.

MR. ENSTROM: [Paragraph] Number 12, the allegation of course is the presentation to the Board of these 5,900-plus signatures, which goes to show again this long, deep, and continuing opposition to the forced busing as it bears on white flight.

THE COURT: Just a moment. Yes, go ahead.

MR. ENSTROM: Number 12, that bears on white flight, particularly. When I refer to white flight, I am talking about the issues of objectors leaving the school system, which has been a matter about which evidence has been received. And I don't think it is necessarily referring to any particular race.

THE COURT: No... Still... I sustain the objection to the declaration....

THE COURT: Exhibit 8 you are referring to?

MR. ENSTROM: Exhibit 8, yes. I would like to have that received in evidence.

THE COURT: What is this all about?

MR. ENSTROM: That refers to the elementary exchange program. We want to show the staff introduced a forced busing program to the District on October 21. About a year after Proposition 1 was passed. It goes to the allegation in our complaint in intervention that the