Public Schools - Case Documents, Busing App page-135

Busing — Opposed: Appendices

135

Appendices

Titles of appendices are listed online for reference. The appendices in the printed book, print-only pages 136 – 151, are photocopies of busing-case related documents, or excerpts from documents, whose substance is developed in the body of the book.

I.	Article by author entitled Busing, Not Integration, Opposed, published on September 18, 1977, in The San Diego Union	print 136

II.	Article I, Section 7(a), of the California Constitution, as amended (by initiative Proposition 1) November 6, 1979	print 139

III.	Title page of Application of Petitioners in Crawford v. Board of Education of the City of Los Angeles for leave to Appear and to File a Brief Amici Curiae in Support of the Unconstitutionality of the Recent Amendment (Proposition 1) on the November 6, 1979 Ballot to Article 1, Section 7(a) of the California Constitution, etc. (Application granted January 3, 1980, in San Bernardino Superior Court) No. 155286	print 140

IV.	Ruling, dated Feb. 20, 1980, by San Bernardino Superior Court Judge Paul Egly denying Application of Groundswell, et al. (to appear as amici curiae and interested persons) in National Assoc. for the Advancement of Colored People, et al. v. San Bernardino Unified Sch. Dist., No. 155286	print 141

V.	Excerpt (excerpted exemplar from petitions of San Diego students objecting to racial school assignments) from Declaration of Larry Lester; Intervenors' Exhibit 6 for Identification, on July 16, 1981, in Carlin v. Board of Education	print 142

VI.	Title page of Brief of Intervenors (Groundswell, et al) in Carlin v. Board of Education San Diego Unified School District as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner for Reversal, together with portion of brief entitled Interest of Amici Curiae and Summary of Argument, submitted May 11, 1990, to the Supreme Court in The Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools, etc., Petitioner, v. Robert L. Dowell, et al., Respondents, on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 89-1080	print 143

VII.	Title page of Brief of Intervenors (Groundswell, et al) in Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners, together with portion of brief entitled Summary of Argument, submitted May 1, 1991, to the Supreme Court in Robert R. Freeman, et al., Petitioners, v. Willie Eugene Pitts, et al., on Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 89-1290	print 149

Carlin

Carlin v. Board of Education, San Diego Unified School District, San Diego Superior Court No. 303800 (1967-1998)
San Diego, California
Enstrom: pro bono counsel, 1979-1998

Crawford I

Crawford v. Board of Education, 17 Cal.3d 280 (1976)
Los Angeles, California

N.A.A.C.P. v. San Bernardino Unified Sch. Dist., Superior Court No. 155286 (1979)
San Bernardino, California
Enstrom: submitted amici curiae brief (denied by judge)

Dowell

Dowell v. Bd. of Educ. of Okl. City Public Schools, (10th Cir. 1989), 890 F.2d 1483
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Enstrom: filed amici curiae brief

Freeman

Freeman v. Pitts, 112 S.Ct. 1430 (1992)
DeKalb County School System (DCSS),
DeKalb County, Georgia
Enstrom: filed amici curiae brief

List of referenced Rights Cases by Title

List of referenced Rights Cases by Date

[ Busing: list of print-only pages 136 - 151 ]


Busing – Not Integration – Opposed	Contents
Invoke our Color-Blind Constitution to End It
by Elmer Enstrom, Jr. - a pro bono case history
of a reasoned opposition to race-based affirmative action in public schools.

www.Enstrom-Foundation.org
© 1998-2006 Enstrom Foundation
Email: public-interest@Enstrom-Foundation.org	Recommend